What I find particularly offensive, though, is listening to some dude with “evolving” views on fags like me wave Stonewall at America in the middle of the series of glorious non sequiturs that constituted his address in order to affirm that the rising tide of American moral imagination lifts all boats, even the fucking gay ones. Fuck that shit, Mr. Prez. America is a nation of tantrum-throwing moral infants that’s been dragged bawling out of the crib of its own moral and ethical object impermanence, and even now it’s kicking and screaming on the floor of the department store, yelling that some black guy got into a California law school ahead of a deserving white.
Oh good, the President has reluctantly and at length come around to the idea that the gays oughta be married, and his own evolution on the matter is cast as a microcosm of the mythopoeic inevitability of the expanding rights and franchise of America. Aw, we just needed to get to know you gays, uh, guys I mean. And then we figured out that you’re okay! For which, I think, we are supposed to be grateful. No, actually, not just grateful. Actually, edified. Like, our cameo in the inaugural feature is supposed to be valedictory, after all those years waiting tables, we finally got the callback. Put on your dance belt Mary Jane, and stretch those quads.
Jacob Bacharach 
Do you mean “bear” in the hairy adult-male sense?
Si.
What do you have against evolution? Don’t you BELIEVE in SCIENCE?
Intelligent Design Within Reach
Fuck. Yes.
Stonewall was a violent reaction to violent state oppression. So maybe what he was saying is there should be more prison riots?
And we throw pink washing at Israel.
I actually know nothing about Stonewall. I had to go google it because I was getting the impression that this was about some revelation that Stonewall Jackson was gay, which somehow validated homosexuality for the South.
It would be cool if it were a nation of baby morels, though.
tre , up in the wee hours to put another log on the rad , sat for a moment with the lips of the last post ,tre , .. . then thought about she pup, and then the fish .. . ,what is he going to do with that fish, .. said the fish .. as shh ee e slip out the window in to the snow .. . .
the strictly physical, “scientific” world, despises the ‘female’ (just take a gander at that Washington Monument, (The London City Corp/Switzerland RE Gherkin, Spain, Dubai, etcetera..). So it shouldn’t surprise, if it even does, that it even hates ‘males’ who feel more ‘female’ than ‘male’ …….
what to do about it? …. I admit that I cant put it into ‘words’ ……
I have a comment, ‘above’ this (previously made, but being mulled upon by certain algorithms …I guess), sitting in the ‘moderation’ bin, thanks for whatever you can do to retrieve it (if you even ever end up seeing it?), Jacob.
That comment, was written as follows (why yes, ….yes I am ,…trying my ‘luck’):
(originally written, sans the “html” “italics” and “html” “blockquote”s, ..I suppose I should add…)